Google Tag Manager icon
A California municipal wastewater treatment facility (WWTF) with 4 lagoons primarily processed municipal waste as well as several types of commercial/ industrial waste, including waste from a tomato processing plant and a dairy processing plant, for a total of 2.8 million gallons a day.

CASE STUDY

Wastewater municipality saves $6 million by reducing lagoon biosolids by 68 million gallons in one year

The Problem

The influent to the wastewater system was primarily municipal, with some commercial and industrial sources (25%) for a total of 2.8 million gallons a day. Each primary lagoon – Ponds 1A and 1B – was estimated to hold 25 million gallons of water.

A sludge judge was performed on the primary lagoons as a baseline. The overall lagoon depth averaged 10 feet with 2 feet of freeboard. It was determined that the sludge blanket was greater than 5 feet in several locations in both primary lagoons, Pond 1A and Pond 1B. The high average sludge-blanket depth significantly reduced the primary lagoon’s overall capacity.

The Solution

A biostimulant was selected to support the reduction of the organic solids in the system. The liquid biostimulant was added via peristaltic pump to the lagoon inlets. Initially the dose applied was 7 ppm and was eventually decreased 10 months later to 5 ppm. A maintenance dose of 3 ppm was established 2 months later.

Results

Measurements used to calculate sludge removal are shown in Table 1 below. These values correlated to about 9,375,000 gallons of sludge removal or about 2,800 truckloads. An additional 57.4 MG/Year of solids were treated in addition to what was removed resulting in a total sludge removal of 66.8 million gallons of sludge, or 17,800 dry tons. At a cost of $340/dry ton for hauling offsite and disposal, the estimated savings was $6,066,000.

Table 1 – Sludge Removal Calculations

Benefits

• $6 million cost avoidance in dredging, hauling, disposal costs.
• 45% reduction of sludge depth
• Equivalent of 17,810 dry tons of sludge removed

Recent News

Advanced Filtration Dynamic Membrane Technology

Advanced Filtration Dynamic Membrane Technology

Advanced Filtration Dynamic Membrane Technology CORNCOB advanced filtration dynamic membrane technology can convert nearly any wastewater stream into clean reusable water in a small footprint, Decentralized Wastewater Treatment System (DEWATS). Compared to innovative...

DNA-based performance comparison of anaerobic digesters

DNA-based performance comparison of anaerobic digesters

Performance comparison of anaerobic digesters using next generation DNA sequencing Anaerobic digesters are employed in wastewater, landfill and livestock operations worldwide to create renewable energy. Improving biogas production in a one-million gallon reactor by...

WWTP saves $35m with Low DO, 1-step nitrification/de-nitrification

WWTP saves $35m with Low DO, 1-step nitrification/de-nitrification

CASE STUDY Wastewater municipality saves $35 million with one-step nitrification/de-nitrificationThe Problem Trinity River Authority, TX (162MGD) needed an optimal nutrient removal strategy for a planned significant expansion in capacity. Assuming a standard two-step...

Water Jobs for Young Leaders

Water Jobs for Young Leaders

Water Jobs for Young Leaders According to the Association of Water Technologies 2019 Benchmarking Survey, hiring qualified employees is the top challenge over the next five years for middle market water businesses. That's a tough challenge. As a result, WaterTrust is...

PFAS contamination. Key things to know.

PFAS contamination. Key things to know.

PFAS Contamination - Key Things to Know PFAS contamination of water resources has made the national stage recently. (See: Toxic ‘forever chemicals’ more common in tap water than thought). PFAS chemicals Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of...

watertrust

Modern water solutions that provide economic and environmental value

microbe detectives